Several inspirational year-end messages can be heard by clicking on the links below:
This includes a timely sermon by Dr. David Jeremiah as we look forward to the New Year: Taking stock and setting goals is important, learning to say no in order to say yes is always a challenge, and not letting past mistakes paralyze us into inaction are all topics covered by Dr. Jeremiah in today's message here.
Then, in case you've been thinking where Saddam Hussein might be, after being hung several days ago, Chuck Swindoll addresses the real twilight zone and why we need to think about where we're headed after we die here. And part 2 of this talk is here. Both are from Swindoll's most highly requested talks series of 2006.
Sunday, December 31, 2006
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Sunshine and Salt Water in Winter
Friday, December 29, 2006
Here We Go Again: John Edwards
An editorial in Investors Business Daily sets the record straight about millionaire trial lawyer John Edwards running for president (again) and starting to harp (again and again) on two Americas:
"Edwards is right: There are two Americas. One believes in the genius of the American people. The other believes in the power of trial lawyers and government."
Read the whole thing here.
What would we do without candidates with messianic complexes to the rescue with easy fixes that they say only government and litigation can cure? And when will we ever get it that government isn't the primary answer to most of our problems and never will be?
The Constitution enumerates what the federal government responsibilities are and in most cases they are not what Edwards says they are.
Edwards wants to be a part of the solution of the healthcare crisis that up until now he has only helped to create and perpetuate.
Healthcare costs have skyrocketed for the average man primarily for two reasons: 1) out-of-control class action lawsuits for medical malpractice where there are no caps on hugh settlements, which we all end up paying for, and 2) lack of personal responsibility in both health savings accounts and individual health habits that ask us to focus more on prevention of disease and wellness. Personal responsibility includes focus on diet, exercise and giving up smoking, excessive drinking and sugar addictions, among other things.
There are increasing numbers of people--who Edwards is appealling to-- who want to take no responsibility for themselves, their health or finances, and would rather have government take care of them. T
The system, no matter what politicians like Edwards promise, will eventually break under the strain. Just ask the state of Tennessee what has happened to the budget under the strain of Tenncare and how it has threatened to bankrupt the entire state system and close down state government on several occasions.
Candidates like Edwards only perpetuate the myth and the false hope of quick government fixes for issues like healthcare.
Warning, much harping by Edwards ahead. Sadly, many people will grab onto his false hopeful harping only to be once again disappointed as 75 million retirees enter the system expecting government to take care of them.
Edwards promises false only hope and ultimate disappointment. I won't even get into the issue of New Orleans right now. That's for another post.
"Edwards is right: There are two Americas. One believes in the genius of the American people. The other believes in the power of trial lawyers and government."
Read the whole thing here.
What would we do without candidates with messianic complexes to the rescue with easy fixes that they say only government and litigation can cure? And when will we ever get it that government isn't the primary answer to most of our problems and never will be?
The Constitution enumerates what the federal government responsibilities are and in most cases they are not what Edwards says they are.
Edwards wants to be a part of the solution of the healthcare crisis that up until now he has only helped to create and perpetuate.
Healthcare costs have skyrocketed for the average man primarily for two reasons: 1) out-of-control class action lawsuits for medical malpractice where there are no caps on hugh settlements, which we all end up paying for, and 2) lack of personal responsibility in both health savings accounts and individual health habits that ask us to focus more on prevention of disease and wellness. Personal responsibility includes focus on diet, exercise and giving up smoking, excessive drinking and sugar addictions, among other things.
There are increasing numbers of people--who Edwards is appealling to-- who want to take no responsibility for themselves, their health or finances, and would rather have government take care of them. T
The system, no matter what politicians like Edwards promise, will eventually break under the strain. Just ask the state of Tennessee what has happened to the budget under the strain of Tenncare and how it has threatened to bankrupt the entire state system and close down state government on several occasions.
Candidates like Edwards only perpetuate the myth and the false hope of quick government fixes for issues like healthcare.
Warning, much harping by Edwards ahead. Sadly, many people will grab onto his false hopeful harping only to be once again disappointed as 75 million retirees enter the system expecting government to take care of them.
Edwards promises false only hope and ultimate disappointment. I won't even get into the issue of New Orleans right now. That's for another post.
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Lots of Sunshine and Nature
By nature, I am not a resorty, country cluby type person although I can enjoy short soujorns almost anywhere. To wit, Kiawah Island is a great place to get away to play tennis, walk on the beach, bike and watch wildlife.
It is lovely here today: I am thrilled that I've had success using my camera with this computer to download photos. I actually just played two hours of tennis and feel terrific. It's in the 60s, the best possible temp for getting exercise, in my opinion. And almost no humidity.
And another good thing is we are finding a good balance between being together and separate. Everyone comes together to things for a while and then scatters to do their own thing....I like that way of being with others
so much. Too much wall-to-wall contact wears me and everyone out.
And I haven't even thought of radial Islam (hardly) once. But there are a stack of books on the subject awaiting my attention beside my bed.
See ya later, alligator.
It is lovely here today: I am thrilled that I've had success using my camera with this computer to download photos. I actually just played two hours of tennis and feel terrific. It's in the 60s, the best possible temp for getting exercise, in my opinion. And almost no humidity.
And another good thing is we are finding a good balance between being together and separate. Everyone comes together to things for a while and then scatters to do their own thing....I like that way of being with others
so much. Too much wall-to-wall contact wears me and everyone out.
And I haven't even thought of radial Islam (hardly) once. But there are a stack of books on the subject awaiting my attention beside my bed.
See ya later, alligator.
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
A Couple of Days with Some Good Books, a Tennis Racquet and Family
I just caught up with Instapundit and Dr. Helen chilling out in Key West, Roger Simon cross-country skiing in Washington state and Port McClellan kayaking around Newport Beach, CA. So for the record, I am with family at Kiawah Island, SC for a couple of days of tennis, reading and walking on a chilly beach. The weather so far is atrocious but supposed to brighten up Wednesday.
Just checked the Drudge Report to see that Saddam's death sentence was upheld in court and he's scheduled to hang within 30 days. Joel Rosenberg has written about it here. I think what is has to say is both compassionate and clear. It's also very hard to do.
I'm beginning to come out of my holiday funk as I have started eating sensibly again. My daughter told me the family was arranging an intervention to get me off rolls, croissants, Charlotte Russe and pumpkin pie, all of which have added to my sense of being sluggish both physically and emotionally over the past week. I have eaten more sugar and white flour in the past week than in the past year and have certainly felt it.
Anyway, I'm on my way to have a salad for dinner and intend to keep cutting down drastically on starches and completely eliminating all sugars. A few tennis clinics tomorrow should help me shake off the last vestiges of those incredible blahs.
Hopefully.
Just checked the Drudge Report to see that Saddam's death sentence was upheld in court and he's scheduled to hang within 30 days. Joel Rosenberg has written about it here. I think what is has to say is both compassionate and clear. It's also very hard to do.
I'm beginning to come out of my holiday funk as I have started eating sensibly again. My daughter told me the family was arranging an intervention to get me off rolls, croissants, Charlotte Russe and pumpkin pie, all of which have added to my sense of being sluggish both physically and emotionally over the past week. I have eaten more sugar and white flour in the past week than in the past year and have certainly felt it.
Anyway, I'm on my way to have a salad for dinner and intend to keep cutting down drastically on starches and completely eliminating all sugars. A few tennis clinics tomorrow should help me shake off the last vestiges of those incredible blahs.
Hopefully.
Sunday, December 24, 2006
While We Were Still Helpless, Christ Was Born on The First Christmas Morning
Lon Solomon, of McLean Bible Church, gives his Christmas message on the birth of our Savior on Christmas Day over 2,ooo years ago here.
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Slow Time for Blogging and More Time for Praying for Ricky
I had so many things I wanted to post here at Christmas. But alas, I have been so busy that I have fallen short of that goal. On top of that, my fairly regular Christmas funk has set in and I'm simply not much good for anything right now.
I love most every holiday, especially Thanksgiving. But as Christmas rolls around, I find myself wanting to crawl into a hole for a few days and be quiet.
Today I learned that a lovely man I have known for years was hit by a car while changing a flat tire on the side of the highway. When I heard he was not expected to live, or if he does, will sustain major brain damage, I dropped everything to go to see him at the trauma unit at the city's biggest hospital.
I was so deeply touched and grieved when I went into his room and saw him suffering and fighting so valiantly for his life today that I have not been able to bounce back. Instead, I have on and off grieved this man's suffering intensely and am feeling completely exhausted.
I am praying for Ricky Primm and his family. And if you can spare a minute, please pray for him too. And for all those who are in pain today.
God bless and comfort this fine man in his deepest hour of suffering and intense need. I am not sure what else to even pray for right now.
I love most every holiday, especially Thanksgiving. But as Christmas rolls around, I find myself wanting to crawl into a hole for a few days and be quiet.
Today I learned that a lovely man I have known for years was hit by a car while changing a flat tire on the side of the highway. When I heard he was not expected to live, or if he does, will sustain major brain damage, I dropped everything to go to see him at the trauma unit at the city's biggest hospital.
I was so deeply touched and grieved when I went into his room and saw him suffering and fighting so valiantly for his life today that I have not been able to bounce back. Instead, I have on and off grieved this man's suffering intensely and am feeling completely exhausted.
I am praying for Ricky Primm and his family. And if you can spare a minute, please pray for him too. And for all those who are in pain today.
God bless and comfort this fine man in his deepest hour of suffering and intense need. I am not sure what else to even pray for right now.
Wonderful Editorial by Tom Krannawitter
I had the good fortune to meet and study with Tom Krannawitter in the summer of 2005 at the Claremont Institue's Lincoln Fellowship program.
Here is a recent editorial that Tom wrote for Investors Business Daily which I want to post here. I couldn't agree more with what he says:
Winning Strategy For Republicans: Getting Rid Of Racial Preferences
BY THOMAS KRANNAWITTER
12/18/2006
While many Republicans are still reeling from November's election, one important conservative victory has received less attention than it deserves: Michigan's vote to end racial preferences and discrimination. Republicans should pay attention because ending racist "affirmative action" policies could be part of a winning strategy in the future.
I lived in California in 1996 when the California Civil Rights Initiative was approved by 54% of voters in that November's election. The measure prohibited the state from discriminating against and granting preferential treatment to anyone on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity and national origin in public employment, public education and public contracting.
That same year, incumbent President Bill Clinton was being challenged by Republican Bob Dole. Dole consciously distanced himself from the CCRI throughout most of his campaign, at one point praising Colin Powell — who Dole hoped would join him on the Republican ticket — for a speech in which Powell defended racial preferences and denounced the CCRI. Dole lost California by a massive margin as President Clinton won re-election.
Telling Statistics
But the numbers from California's 1996 general election tell an interesting story that is too little known in Republican circles: 3,828,380 Californians voted for Dole — 5,119,835 voted for Clinton. But 5,268,462 voted for the CCRI. Not only did the CCRI receive nearly 1.5 million more votes than Dole, but more Californians voted to end racial preferences and discrimination than voted for Democrat Clinton.
Ward Connerly, who chaired the CCRI campaign, next took the fight for equality under the law to Washington state, where the Washington State Civil Rights Act handily won by 58% in the 1998 midterm general election.
Fast-forward to Nov. 7, 2006. I now reside in Michigan, where the incumbent governor, Democrat Jennifer Granholm, crushed Republican challenger Dick DeVos — no surprise on a day when many Republicans were defeated. But on that same day, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, modeled on California's 1996 Civil Rights Initiative, cruised to an easy victory with 58% of Michiganders approving it.
DeVos ran on a platform of job creation and economic growth in a state suffering the bleakest economy in the country. Yet he could muster only 1.3 million votes, while more than 1.8 million Michiganders voted for the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Half a million more people voted to end race-based "affirmative action" than voted for him.
Refusing To Speak Up
And where was DeVos on the critical question of government-sponsored racism? He opposed the MCRI, but never explained why. DeVos said the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative "raises some serious issues for public discussion," but he refused to be part of the discussion he said was so important.
Republicans should be able to score electoral points by campaigning to end racial preferences and discrimination, so why do they stubbornly refuse to fight for equal protection of equal rights? The answer, at least in part, is provided by Shelby Steele in his recent book, "White Guilt."
"When white supremacy was delegitimized" during the civil rights era of the 1960s, argues Steele, "whites did not simply lose the authority to practice racism . . . whites also lost a degree of their authority to stand proudly for the values and ideas that had made the West a great civilization."
After the '60s, the new race-conscious liberalism insisted that any defense of Western and especially American principles and institutions was a defense of racism. Liberal elites' strategy to regain the moral and political authority that was lost, Steele reminds us, has been twofold:
First, conscientious Americans must dissociate themselves from the racism of America's past, which includes dissociating oneself from the supposedly racist Constitution of the founders — providing additional arguments, incidentally, in favor of a liberal "living constitution." Demonstrating liberal racial consciousness and liberal morality requires Americans not only to condemn racism, but also to condemn America itself.
Second, liberals should take responsibility for the problems caused by racism. The most visible way to be responsible, in the liberal sense, is to support affirmative action programs that offer racial preferences and take responsibility away from blacks and other racial minorities.
By supporting racial preferences, liberals inoculate themselves against accusations of racism — how could anyone be racist who supports affirmative action? Contrary, from the liberal view, anyone who attacks racial preferences is not taking responsibility for racism. They are part of the problem, not the solution.
This is the widely known but seldom admitted reason so many Republicans refuse to defend colorblind policies and campaign against race-based preferences and discrimination: They are scared they might be accused of being racist and they are not confident they can defend themselves against such accusations. So, many do what Dick DeVos did. They remain silent and suffer at the polls for it.
Elections Tell The Story
As recent elections demonstrate, however, ordinary Americans — even those in blue states like California, Washington and Michigan — do not like policies of race-based preferences and discrimination. Republicans ought to recall that equal protection of equal rights is the American ideal, enshrined forever in the proposition that all men are created equal. And it is right. Racism is wrong precisely because equality is right.
Republicans should also recall that the principle of equality is at home in the Republican Party. It was the reason the party was founded in 1854 and it was central to the politics of the greatest Republican and greatest civil rights advocate in American history: Abraham Lincoln.
Rather than avoid the subject, Republicans should defend colorblind justice and lead the charge to end racial preferences and discrimination. If they do, they might start winning elections the way initiatives for colorblind policies do.
Dr. Krannawitter teaches political science at Hillsdale College and is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute.
Here is a recent editorial that Tom wrote for Investors Business Daily which I want to post here. I couldn't agree more with what he says:
Winning Strategy For Republicans: Getting Rid Of Racial Preferences
BY THOMAS KRANNAWITTER
12/18/2006
While many Republicans are still reeling from November's election, one important conservative victory has received less attention than it deserves: Michigan's vote to end racial preferences and discrimination. Republicans should pay attention because ending racist "affirmative action" policies could be part of a winning strategy in the future.
I lived in California in 1996 when the California Civil Rights Initiative was approved by 54% of voters in that November's election. The measure prohibited the state from discriminating against and granting preferential treatment to anyone on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity and national origin in public employment, public education and public contracting.
That same year, incumbent President Bill Clinton was being challenged by Republican Bob Dole. Dole consciously distanced himself from the CCRI throughout most of his campaign, at one point praising Colin Powell — who Dole hoped would join him on the Republican ticket — for a speech in which Powell defended racial preferences and denounced the CCRI. Dole lost California by a massive margin as President Clinton won re-election.
Telling Statistics
But the numbers from California's 1996 general election tell an interesting story that is too little known in Republican circles: 3,828,380 Californians voted for Dole — 5,119,835 voted for Clinton. But 5,268,462 voted for the CCRI. Not only did the CCRI receive nearly 1.5 million more votes than Dole, but more Californians voted to end racial preferences and discrimination than voted for Democrat Clinton.
Ward Connerly, who chaired the CCRI campaign, next took the fight for equality under the law to Washington state, where the Washington State Civil Rights Act handily won by 58% in the 1998 midterm general election.
Fast-forward to Nov. 7, 2006. I now reside in Michigan, where the incumbent governor, Democrat Jennifer Granholm, crushed Republican challenger Dick DeVos — no surprise on a day when many Republicans were defeated. But on that same day, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, modeled on California's 1996 Civil Rights Initiative, cruised to an easy victory with 58% of Michiganders approving it.
DeVos ran on a platform of job creation and economic growth in a state suffering the bleakest economy in the country. Yet he could muster only 1.3 million votes, while more than 1.8 million Michiganders voted for the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Half a million more people voted to end race-based "affirmative action" than voted for him.
Refusing To Speak Up
And where was DeVos on the critical question of government-sponsored racism? He opposed the MCRI, but never explained why. DeVos said the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative "raises some serious issues for public discussion," but he refused to be part of the discussion he said was so important.
Republicans should be able to score electoral points by campaigning to end racial preferences and discrimination, so why do they stubbornly refuse to fight for equal protection of equal rights? The answer, at least in part, is provided by Shelby Steele in his recent book, "White Guilt."
"When white supremacy was delegitimized" during the civil rights era of the 1960s, argues Steele, "whites did not simply lose the authority to practice racism . . . whites also lost a degree of their authority to stand proudly for the values and ideas that had made the West a great civilization."
After the '60s, the new race-conscious liberalism insisted that any defense of Western and especially American principles and institutions was a defense of racism. Liberal elites' strategy to regain the moral and political authority that was lost, Steele reminds us, has been twofold:
First, conscientious Americans must dissociate themselves from the racism of America's past, which includes dissociating oneself from the supposedly racist Constitution of the founders — providing additional arguments, incidentally, in favor of a liberal "living constitution." Demonstrating liberal racial consciousness and liberal morality requires Americans not only to condemn racism, but also to condemn America itself.
Second, liberals should take responsibility for the problems caused by racism. The most visible way to be responsible, in the liberal sense, is to support affirmative action programs that offer racial preferences and take responsibility away from blacks and other racial minorities.
By supporting racial preferences, liberals inoculate themselves against accusations of racism — how could anyone be racist who supports affirmative action? Contrary, from the liberal view, anyone who attacks racial preferences is not taking responsibility for racism. They are part of the problem, not the solution.
This is the widely known but seldom admitted reason so many Republicans refuse to defend colorblind policies and campaign against race-based preferences and discrimination: They are scared they might be accused of being racist and they are not confident they can defend themselves against such accusations. So, many do what Dick DeVos did. They remain silent and suffer at the polls for it.
Elections Tell The Story
As recent elections demonstrate, however, ordinary Americans — even those in blue states like California, Washington and Michigan — do not like policies of race-based preferences and discrimination. Republicans ought to recall that equal protection of equal rights is the American ideal, enshrined forever in the proposition that all men are created equal. And it is right. Racism is wrong precisely because equality is right.
Republicans should also recall that the principle of equality is at home in the Republican Party. It was the reason the party was founded in 1854 and it was central to the politics of the greatest Republican and greatest civil rights advocate in American history: Abraham Lincoln.
Rather than avoid the subject, Republicans should defend colorblind justice and lead the charge to end racial preferences and discrimination. If they do, they might start winning elections the way initiatives for colorblind policies do.
Dr. Krannawitter teaches political science at Hillsdale College and is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Thursday: A Couple of Quotes
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then is not an act, but a habit."
------Aristotle
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
-------George S. Patton
------Aristotle
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
-------George S. Patton
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Inner Terrorist Alert: Many More Frequent and Severe Heart Attacks in Winter
Tuesday in the Wall Street Journal, Tara Parker-Pope had a piece on why heart attack risks rise in winter and what you can do about it. I find this interesting and imporant information to summarize in today's post. It is something I have thought for a long time but only now seeing in the media:
Here's what the article says:
Most people associate winter with flu and cold season, as well as dry skin, but few link it with a much higher risk of heart attack. But according to a study by researchers in Massachusetts, the risks for heart attack in January are twice those in July for the general population. And the study goes on that the risk of a fatal heart attack is much greater in cold than in warm weather.
And in fact the study finds that heart attack risks and other health problems follow cyclinal patterns. Did you know that cholesterol cycles peak in December for men and in January for women; there are more ER visits on Mondays than any other day of the week; and strokes and heart attacks occur more frequently between 6 am and noon on any given day?
Reasons given for this are numerous and often self-evident: Cold weather constricts veins and arteries; holiday meals, ladened with fats and sugars, are often eaten late in the day and then slept on; in the season of holiday celebrations too much alcohol and tobacco often damage heart muscles irrevocably; and finally less light in the northern hemisphere during winter and lower vitamin D levels may have subtle effects not only on one's mood but also on their heart.
Warmer weather and sunlight probably have a sanguine effect on one's
general health as well as one's heart.
This makes perfect sense to me. So what can we do to lessen our risks of heart attacks, now the leading cause of death in women too?
----Be aware that prolonged time in the cold constricts blood vessels and increases your risks of cardio-vascular events.
----Eat less sugar and fats and dairy, and if you eat them at all, do it earlier in the day rather than later at night. And if you're going to sin, sin earlier in the day rather than later (my own two cents worth).
----Take cod liver oil with high levels of vitamin D, or some other form of this important vitamin.
----Get sunlight on your face and in your eyes as much as possible in the winter. It brightens your mood and reduces other health risks considerably.
----Stay away from smoky rooms with little fresh air.
----Whenever possible, replace butter and other fats with extra virgin olive oil (my own two cents worth). I even eat olive oil on what little bread I consume.
----Remember to walk briskly everyday. The more we don't want to exercise and put it off, the more our bodies really need it. And don't go out and shovel snow in the cold, if you're not in shape for it.
----And if you are at a higher risk for heart attack and can, spend the winter in a warmer climate where you can get more daily exercise and sunlight.
These recommendation are all cumulative, but it's never too late to start and make them into winter disciplines to live by.
Here's what the article says:
Most people associate winter with flu and cold season, as well as dry skin, but few link it with a much higher risk of heart attack. But according to a study by researchers in Massachusetts, the risks for heart attack in January are twice those in July for the general population. And the study goes on that the risk of a fatal heart attack is much greater in cold than in warm weather.
And in fact the study finds that heart attack risks and other health problems follow cyclinal patterns. Did you know that cholesterol cycles peak in December for men and in January for women; there are more ER visits on Mondays than any other day of the week; and strokes and heart attacks occur more frequently between 6 am and noon on any given day?
Reasons given for this are numerous and often self-evident: Cold weather constricts veins and arteries; holiday meals, ladened with fats and sugars, are often eaten late in the day and then slept on; in the season of holiday celebrations too much alcohol and tobacco often damage heart muscles irrevocably; and finally less light in the northern hemisphere during winter and lower vitamin D levels may have subtle effects not only on one's mood but also on their heart.
Warmer weather and sunlight probably have a sanguine effect on one's
general health as well as one's heart.
This makes perfect sense to me. So what can we do to lessen our risks of heart attacks, now the leading cause of death in women too?
----Be aware that prolonged time in the cold constricts blood vessels and increases your risks of cardio-vascular events.
----Eat less sugar and fats and dairy, and if you eat them at all, do it earlier in the day rather than later at night. And if you're going to sin, sin earlier in the day rather than later (my own two cents worth).
----Take cod liver oil with high levels of vitamin D, or some other form of this important vitamin.
----Get sunlight on your face and in your eyes as much as possible in the winter. It brightens your mood and reduces other health risks considerably.
----Stay away from smoky rooms with little fresh air.
----Whenever possible, replace butter and other fats with extra virgin olive oil (my own two cents worth). I even eat olive oil on what little bread I consume.
----Remember to walk briskly everyday. The more we don't want to exercise and put it off, the more our bodies really need it. And don't go out and shovel snow in the cold, if you're not in shape for it.
----And if you are at a higher risk for heart attack and can, spend the winter in a warmer climate where you can get more daily exercise and sunlight.
These recommendation are all cumulative, but it's never too late to start and make them into winter disciplines to live by.
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
America Falls in Love with a Fantasy: It's An O-Bama-Nation
The Paris Hilton of candidates, all style and no substance, the liberal's favorite candidate is seen as being someone bearing hope, with fresh new ideas.
Oh please.
Pardon me for laughing. Obama has virtually no experience . He is a face guy with a nice presentation. But when I read about his liberal voting record, he gets less and less handsome by the minute.
We're at war. And electing this kind of candidate is no way to win that war.
I have written more about this candidate here.
And as for Obama's self-described "boneheaded" mistake back in Chicago, you can read more here.
Monday, December 18, 2006
Internet Now Surpasses Newspapers In Readership
Here is an interesting new study on the decline of newspapers and rise of Internet use for readers, according to Editor and Publisher, the country's oldest journal covering the newspaper business.
Of course, for the vast majority of Americans, television is still the media of choice. Then it's radio and next computers. But utilizing computers for information and opinion is a growing phenomena with no end in sight.
And reading news, analysis and opinion on blogs and collections of blogs like at PajamasMedia.com is only going to grow as the media to go to,
especially for people who are tired of the same ole, same ole, liberal bias from the worn out Main Stream Media (MSM).
As I reflect on my own use of various mediums, it's startling to me how little television I watch anymore for news, and even entertainment. I find most of it a wasteland. Also stunning how much more I use my computer to get news, opinion and real information.
I tend to listen to the radio more in my car and turn on the TV more in the coldest part of winter than the rest of the year. But I'm probably not typical of the average person in the study. And I'm also a new blogger, which requires more time on the computer.
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Advent: A Look at Islam Contrasted with Christianity
In a sermon from a few years back, Lon Solomon pastor of McLean Bible Church in McLean, Virginia talks about the religion of Islam and contrasts it to Christianity here.
And remember, for millions of Muslims worldwide, there is no, I repeat NO, separation between church and state. Under Islamic sharia law, the caliphate is the highest spiritual and political leader of in any land. Muslims worldwide seek this law to be the highest law of every land in the world including our land here in the United States.
Then Solomon gives a sermon about the Virgin Birth Jesus Christ here.
This is must listening for believers and non-believers in Jesus Christ alike.
Friday, December 15, 2006
December 15, My Dear Father's Birthday
Father----December 15, 1915---December 25, 1998
Mother---March 25, 1918---June 6, 1969
We miss you, father, and mother too. You'd be happy to know, we're all doing quite well. You were a good man. And we all know, a good man is hard to find. We love you both always.
Opening verses about my family:
He was born 91 years ago,
His destiny to fulfill,
The son of Mamie and Vance always knew
He'd work in a lumber mill.
Growing up hunting and fishing, he walked
These beautiful Tennessee hills,
But nothing ever came close to the thrills
Of running that lumber mill.
He married a fair southern belle named Murl
And they started a fam-i-ly,
They wanted a son, for the work that'd be done
But the next thing they knew, they got me.
Still wanting an heir with the mill he could run,
They waited again.... until,
My sister arrived, and from her crib she decried
"I ain't never gonna run that lumber mill."
---Off the top of my head, part of an old forgotten poem I wrote for my father's 80th birthday celebration and later lost the copy.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
One Dixie Chickie Not Ready to Apologize
Thanks to Hot Air TV for getting me to YouTube for this clever video here.
Appeasement Defined, Lollipops Anyone?
Joel Rosenberg writes about Israeli Natan Sharansky's response to the ISG Report here. His take is that the report is it's an ill-advised document of appeasement. Below is a highlight:
"Washington, D.C., 12/12/06) -- Former Israeli deputy prime minister Natan Sharansky -- who will receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the White House on Friday -- today blasted The Iraq Study Group Report as an act of 'appeasement'."
“I am extremely concerned by the Baker-Hamilton report," Sharansky told a conference call of political bloggers, in which I participated. "It’s very difficult to understand how these outstanding politicians could write a report that is so out of touch with the rest of the world….This report perhaps could have been written on the 10th of September, 2001, but after?"
"Appeasement comes from fear," Sharansky noted. Those who pursue it "don’t have the strength to defend [their] own ideas."
"The message of the Baker-Hamilton report, he said, was a message of encouraging Iran and Syria to continue supporting terrorist organizations because no one is going to stop them."
*******************************************
It's hard to believe that so many people still labor under the impression that terrorists can be negotiated and partnered with for peace. Like the years leading up to Nazi Germany in the late 30s and early 40s when making nice with Hitler was all the rage, today's appeasers are taking a similar tack.
Appeasement is a quick and ineffective fix for those unwilling to defend their position or even to take the time to define and know what that position is. It seems like such a benevolent idea at the time, but so much more deadly later on.
We see where lollipops got us before WWII. Are we willing to learn from that hard-earned mistake, or not?
So what can we do, if appeasement is unworkable?
Here are a few ideas:
1) Because radical Islam and jihad are being funded with our petro dollars: We must promote energy independence in the US from oil in the Middle East using every means possible. That includes drilling in ANWAR.
2) For appeasers who just can't quit: Give lollypops and encouragement to moderate Muslims for resisting and standing up to their militant jihadist brothers. Moderate Muslims are in just as great a danger for resisting militant Islam as we are. Yet all civilized people must speak up and out against these barbarians.
3) Start a branch of AA in your neighborhood, Appeasers Anonymous, a 12-step program for breaking addiction to political correctness and making nice with those who would bring down our civilization. Jimmy Carter would be required to go to meetings every day.
4) Take time to educate yourself with reading, and listening to the other side of the story, other than the Main Stream Media (MSM). HotAir.com should be on everyone's shortlist of daily self-help. For a little more, then go to Jihad Watch.
These daily steps could save you from your life-threatening addiction to the appeasement fix and save our country too.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Monday, December 11, 2006
Two Great Ideas for Christmas/Holiday Giving
This Christmas/Holiday Season, why not give the gift of eternal vigilance?
Each of the videos above: "Relentless--The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East" and "Obsession--Radical Islam's War Against the West"--are one hour DVDs well worth watching.
Filled with facts and figures, it is a quick and painless history lesson that brings viewers up to speed on history in the Middle East and the War on Terror. These films clearly delineate between radical and moderate Islam and clearly show that moderate Muslims are in as great a danger as Christians and Jews if they do not go along with the radical agenda of jihad.
Your family and friends don't take the threats of extreme, militant Islam seriously? They don't have time to read a long book or weed out propaganda from truth in the main stream media? No problem, an hour passes quickly in each of these spellbinding and compelling films. You say friends don't believe Jihad is going forward on the backs of Islamic children who are being brainwashed from the cradle on to die for Allah? It's time to think again and wake up to the most stunning reality of all.
Both of these DVDs are sure to open many eyes in short order of all those fortunate enough to buy, receive and watch them.
Do yourself and your country a favor, give one or both of these important DVDs (or watch Relentless above in full on the web) for Christmas. And watch them yourself. While you still can.
Because there won't be anymore Christmas or Hanukkah under sharia law. And the price of our religious freedoms and great economic/political heritage is eternal vigilance.
Each of the videos above: "Relentless--The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East" and "Obsession--Radical Islam's War Against the West"--are one hour DVDs well worth watching.
Filled with facts and figures, it is a quick and painless history lesson that brings viewers up to speed on history in the Middle East and the War on Terror. These films clearly delineate between radical and moderate Islam and clearly show that moderate Muslims are in as great a danger as Christians and Jews if they do not go along with the radical agenda of jihad.
Your family and friends don't take the threats of extreme, militant Islam seriously? They don't have time to read a long book or weed out propaganda from truth in the main stream media? No problem, an hour passes quickly in each of these spellbinding and compelling films. You say friends don't believe Jihad is going forward on the backs of Islamic children who are being brainwashed from the cradle on to die for Allah? It's time to think again and wake up to the most stunning reality of all.
Both of these DVDs are sure to open many eyes in short order of all those fortunate enough to buy, receive and watch them.
Do yourself and your country a favor, give one or both of these important DVDs (or watch Relentless above in full on the web) for Christmas. And watch them yourself. While you still can.
Because there won't be anymore Christmas or Hanukkah under sharia law. And the price of our religious freedoms and great economic/political heritage is eternal vigilance.
If Barack Becomes President, It Would Be An "O-bama-nation"
I wish this was an original thought, but it's not. This clever pun was told to me recently by one of my computer geniuses who help me regularly with my computer and blog. Thanks, Will P, for making my day with a good and clever pun. But, in truth, the reality of its poignancy is not very funny.
Now say it again: If Barack becomes president, God forbid, it would be an "O-bama-nation" that our country can ill afford. With virtually no experience, and little but looks and evidently some charisma, the left is looking for a candidate to have a lovefest with in all the wrong places. Style over substance to the max.
In a word, an O-bama-nation.
I have written a longer post on Barack here.
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Loneliness at This Time of Year
Yesterday, I spent part of the day with my oldest friend from Marin and her aging father who's just been put in a nursing home here. Over and over again, he complained bitterly to us of his loneliness and isolation, describing his condition as being in "lock up." A retired doctor, he's used to lots going on around him, beloved by family, friends and patients for decades and decades. He has lived a good life by worldly standards.
But today, he is lonely beyond consolation, and having a very hard time finding a reason to live. Some of his behavior in recent months has been appalling. The lonelier he's felt the more drastic have been his attempts to escape into a quick fix.
It is a reality that we see around us everywhere at every age. We experience it in ourselves and see it in others. Loneliness can be a deafening part of life, and unimaginably intense especially as the days get shorter and shorter. We all try to take quick fixes out of the morass of loneliness and often these short-term solutions only end up digging us deeper and deeper into the hole in the long run.
Currently, Dr. David Jeremiah at Oneplace.com is giving a series on loneliness here, and how many of the great men and women of the Bible have suffered its shattering, seemingly never-ending depths. Jesus experienced and took it for all mankind while he was dying on the Cross.
It is by not avoiding loneliness that we often come through to the other side. Rather by embracing it in stillness and surrender, God often meets us in the depths of our despair and darkness. Sometimes just getting down on our knees and telling God of our agonizing loneliness is the beginning of inner comfort and renewal beyond compare whivh slowly, quietly begins to creep back into our lives.
************************************************
A prayer for those earnestly searching for Truth.
Lord Jesus, you claim to be the way, the truth, and the life. Grant that I might come to know You in a living way and not just through another dead religion. Grant that I be undaunted by the cost of following you, as I consider reasons for doing so. If what you claim is true, please guide me, teach me and open me to the living and hopeful reality of who you are. Give me an understanding of you that is coherent, convincing, and that leads to the life you promise. Amen.
(Thanks to Redeemer Presbyterian Church, New York City, for this prayer.)
Saturday, December 09, 2006
The Nativity Story, A Beautiful Movie of the Greatest Story Ever Told
For believers and non-believers alike, this beautifully told story is well worth seeing this Christmas season. Take a child with you when you go.
Prophesied in the Old Testament for a thousand years, that our Lord could have chosen the most lowly, humble and dangerous of beginnings to incarnate is still astounding to me. And oh so touching to read, to see and to remember. And He did it for us all.
Sen. John McCain on the ISC's Report
At the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Thursday, Sen. McCain summed it up succinctly:
On the overall ISG recommendations: "There's only one thing worse than an overstressed Army and Marine Corps, and that's a defeated Army and Marine Corps. I believe [the ISG report] is a recipe that will lead to our defeat sooner or later in Iraq,"
On negotiations with Iran and Syria: "I don't believe that a peace conference with people who are dedicated to your extinction has much short-term gain."
***************************************************
Good for Sen. McCain. We simply cannot let Iraq become another Viet Nam. And those of us who came of age during those unglorious days of the 60s must lead the charge. We must. And we shall.
On the overall ISG recommendations: "There's only one thing worse than an overstressed Army and Marine Corps, and that's a defeated Army and Marine Corps. I believe [the ISG report] is a recipe that will lead to our defeat sooner or later in Iraq,"
On negotiations with Iran and Syria: "I don't believe that a peace conference with people who are dedicated to your extinction has much short-term gain."
***************************************************
Good for Sen. McCain. We simply cannot let Iraq become another Viet Nam. And those of us who came of age during those unglorious days of the 60s must lead the charge. We must. And we shall.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Note from Some Leftwing Nut Who's Wearing Me Out About My Blog Photo Being Dowdy
Okay, so he's an old friend. "Old" in the sense that I've known him since, well, I was a liberal newspaper reporter a long time ago. He's still a liberal, though I've grown up...and I promise, he's the last liberal man I'm ever going out with---even to dinner---on any sort of regular basis. Anyway, this man has been wearing me out for two months about my blog photo, which I like and he detests. I'm sick of hearing it and so am giving him my front page to air his hostility publicly. Then maybe he'll pipe down, Otis, and I can get back to making fun of his favorite liberals.
I've told him that this is not the dating game and I'm not the bacholerette and I like my civilized photo with pearls------all to no avail. So without further ado, I shall give you a man on a mission---to get me to find another photo for my blog:
*************************
Ms. Webutante,
Terrific writing, even from your right wing point of view. Although you are out of step with the rest of America, i.e. recall the last election, your take on a variety of other subjects makes for good reading. You would undoubtedly make a first rate journalist.
Now friends tell me you are an attractive woman of many talents and interests. Though I must say your prudish photograph portrays you more as a Belle Meade tea-sipping socialite, which is fine (I even know a couple of Belle Meaders) and certainly befits your political philosophy. However, not the vibrant, outdoor loving fly fisherwoman who has waded treacherous rivers across the world in search of the wily trout....so claim your admirers.
You're in your early forties? Forgive me, you look seventy. Or so says your photo. Keep up the good work. But for God's Sake, get a new photo and show the world the tiger within you.
And remember, I taught you everything you know about fly fishing.
HG
I've told him that this is not the dating game and I'm not the bacholerette and I like my civilized photo with pearls------all to no avail. So without further ado, I shall give you a man on a mission---to get me to find another photo for my blog:
*************************
Ms. Webutante,
Terrific writing, even from your right wing point of view. Although you are out of step with the rest of America, i.e. recall the last election, your take on a variety of other subjects makes for good reading. You would undoubtedly make a first rate journalist.
Now friends tell me you are an attractive woman of many talents and interests. Though I must say your prudish photograph portrays you more as a Belle Meade tea-sipping socialite, which is fine (I even know a couple of Belle Meaders) and certainly befits your political philosophy. However, not the vibrant, outdoor loving fly fisherwoman who has waded treacherous rivers across the world in search of the wily trout....so claim your admirers.
You're in your early forties? Forgive me, you look seventy. Or so says your photo. Keep up the good work. But for God's Sake, get a new photo and show the world the tiger within you.
And remember, I taught you everything you know about fly fishing.
HG
Blood in the Water, My Water Too, And I Don't Like It, Mr. Baker
Over at Joel Rosenberg, a post on how Iran will read the Iraq Study Group's Report: Blood in the Water. Read the whole thing here.
And then remember, when the great conflagration nears, James Baker the chairman of the ISG, will take his private plane and head for his huge spread of land and trout streams and happy hunting grounds out in Wyoming, near the Green River, and hole up there, as best he can.
Mr. Baker is a fly fisherman, as I am. And he knows well the rules of the river. So Mr. Baker, from one fishing enthusiast to another, just between the two of us, I don't like you messing up the water so that no one else can use it. Blood in the water is simply not acceptable. And I venture to guess Dick doesn't like you messing up our water either. It's all so sloppy.
So take a chair, please, and let it recover as best it can.
What are you trying to do, man, get us all killed?
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
One of Jimmy Carter's Experts Resigns in Protest From the Carter Center
Jimmy Carter lowers the bar again and again. The most anti-Semitic, anti-American president in history, in spite of myths to the contrary, the man is a walking disaster for world peace:
Here from Powerline blog is a brief commentary and then Professor Kenneth Stein's letter of resignation yesterday from association with The Carter Center, and his denunciation of Carter's new book:
"Professor Kenneth Stein of Emory University is apparently terminating his association with the Carter Center, as a result of Carter's new book, Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid. The reaction of Professor Stein -- a formerly close associate and collaborator of Carter -- to Carter's new book is, as our reader thought it would be, of great interest to us.
Stein's resignation letter:
"This note is to inform you that yesterday, I sent letters to President Jimmy Carter, Emory University President Jim Wagner, and Dr. John Hardman, Executive Director of the Carter Center resigning my position, effectively immediately, as Middle East Fellow of the Carter Center of Emory University. This ends my 23 year association with an institution that in some small way I helped shape and develop. My joint academic position in Emory College in the History and Political Science Departments, and, as Director of the Emory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel remains unchanged.
Many still believe that I have an active association with the Center and, act as an adviser to President Carter, neither is the case. President Carter has intermittently continued to come to the Arab-Israeli Conflict class I teach in Emory College. He gives undergraduate students a fine first hand recollection of the Begin-Sadat negotiations of the late 1970s. Since I left the Carter Center physically thirteen years ago, the Middle East program of the Center has waned as has my status as a Carter Center Fellow.
For the record, I had nothing to do with the research, preparation, writing, or review of President Carter's recent publication. Any material which he used from the book we did together in 1984, The Blood of Abraham, he used unilaterally.
President Carter's book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments. Aside from the one-sided nature of the book, meant to provoke, there are recollections cited from meetings where I was the third person in the room, and my notes of those meetings show little similarity to points claimed in the book.
Being a former President does not give one a unique privilege to invent information or to unpack it with cuts, deftly slanted to provide a particular outlook. Having little access to Arabic and Hebrew sources, I believe, clearly handicapped his understanding and analyses of how history has unfolded over the last decade. Falsehoods, if repeated often enough become meta-truths, and they then can become the erroneous baseline for shaping and reinforcing attitudes and for policy-making.
The history and interpretation of the Arab-Israeli conflict is already drowning in half-truths, suppositions, and self-serving myths; more are not necessary. In due course, I shall detail these points and reflect on their origins.
The decade I spent at the Carter Center (1983-1993) as the first permanent Executive Director and as the first Fellow were intellectually enriching for Emory as an institution, the general public, the interns who learned with us, and for me professionally. Setting standards for rigorous interchange and careful analyses spilled out to the other programs that shaped the Center's early years. There was mutual respect for all views; we carefully avoided polemics or special pleading. This book does not hold to those standards. My continued association with the Center leaves the impression that I am sanctioning a series of egregious errors and polemical conclusions which appeared in President Carter's book. I can not allow that impression to stand.
Through Emory College, I have continued my professional commitment to inform students and the general public about the history and politics of Israel, the Middle East, and American policies toward the region. I have tried to remain true to a life-time devotion to scholarly excellence based upon unvarnished analyses and intellectual integrity. I hold fast to the notion that academic settings and those in positions of influence must teach and not preach. Through Emory College, in public lectures, and in OPED writings, I have adhered to the strong belief that history must presented in context, and understood the way it was, not the way we wish it to be.
In closing, let me thank you for your friendship, past and continuing support for ISMI, and to Emory College. Let me also wish you and your loved ones a happy holiday season, and a healthy and productive new year.
As ever,
Ken
Dr. Kenneth W. Stein, Professor of Contemporary Middle Eastern History, Political Science,and Israeli Studies, Director, Middle East Research Program andEmory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel
Atlanta, Georgia
Here from Powerline blog is a brief commentary and then Professor Kenneth Stein's letter of resignation yesterday from association with The Carter Center, and his denunciation of Carter's new book:
"Professor Kenneth Stein of Emory University is apparently terminating his association with the Carter Center, as a result of Carter's new book, Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid. The reaction of Professor Stein -- a formerly close associate and collaborator of Carter -- to Carter's new book is, as our reader thought it would be, of great interest to us.
Stein's resignation letter:
"This note is to inform you that yesterday, I sent letters to President Jimmy Carter, Emory University President Jim Wagner, and Dr. John Hardman, Executive Director of the Carter Center resigning my position, effectively immediately, as Middle East Fellow of the Carter Center of Emory University. This ends my 23 year association with an institution that in some small way I helped shape and develop. My joint academic position in Emory College in the History and Political Science Departments, and, as Director of the Emory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel remains unchanged.
Many still believe that I have an active association with the Center and, act as an adviser to President Carter, neither is the case. President Carter has intermittently continued to come to the Arab-Israeli Conflict class I teach in Emory College. He gives undergraduate students a fine first hand recollection of the Begin-Sadat negotiations of the late 1970s. Since I left the Carter Center physically thirteen years ago, the Middle East program of the Center has waned as has my status as a Carter Center Fellow.
For the record, I had nothing to do with the research, preparation, writing, or review of President Carter's recent publication. Any material which he used from the book we did together in 1984, The Blood of Abraham, he used unilaterally.
President Carter's book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments. Aside from the one-sided nature of the book, meant to provoke, there are recollections cited from meetings where I was the third person in the room, and my notes of those meetings show little similarity to points claimed in the book.
Being a former President does not give one a unique privilege to invent information or to unpack it with cuts, deftly slanted to provide a particular outlook. Having little access to Arabic and Hebrew sources, I believe, clearly handicapped his understanding and analyses of how history has unfolded over the last decade. Falsehoods, if repeated often enough become meta-truths, and they then can become the erroneous baseline for shaping and reinforcing attitudes and for policy-making.
The history and interpretation of the Arab-Israeli conflict is already drowning in half-truths, suppositions, and self-serving myths; more are not necessary. In due course, I shall detail these points and reflect on their origins.
The decade I spent at the Carter Center (1983-1993) as the first permanent Executive Director and as the first Fellow were intellectually enriching for Emory as an institution, the general public, the interns who learned with us, and for me professionally. Setting standards for rigorous interchange and careful analyses spilled out to the other programs that shaped the Center's early years. There was mutual respect for all views; we carefully avoided polemics or special pleading. This book does not hold to those standards. My continued association with the Center leaves the impression that I am sanctioning a series of egregious errors and polemical conclusions which appeared in President Carter's book. I can not allow that impression to stand.
Through Emory College, I have continued my professional commitment to inform students and the general public about the history and politics of Israel, the Middle East, and American policies toward the region. I have tried to remain true to a life-time devotion to scholarly excellence based upon unvarnished analyses and intellectual integrity. I hold fast to the notion that academic settings and those in positions of influence must teach and not preach. Through Emory College, in public lectures, and in OPED writings, I have adhered to the strong belief that history must presented in context, and understood the way it was, not the way we wish it to be.
In closing, let me thank you for your friendship, past and continuing support for ISMI, and to Emory College. Let me also wish you and your loved ones a happy holiday season, and a healthy and productive new year.
As ever,
Ken
Dr. Kenneth W. Stein, Professor of Contemporary Middle Eastern History, Political Science,and Israeli Studies, Director, Middle East Research Program andEmory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel
Atlanta, Georgia
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
An American Beauty Queen Contrasted to Her Afghani Counterpart: An Ugly Story
Great post by Deborah over at The Thought Mill on the stark differences between Miss America and Miss Afghanistan here. Just in case anyone, especially of the female species, thinks it might not be so bad living under sharia law.
My question after reading this and similar stories for years is: why aren't liberals and feminists speaking out in outrage? And gays too, since under Islamic rule, every non-heterosexual would be dispatched (hung, shot, beheaded) immediately?
It's a mystery to me. I guess the feminists would rather concentrate on more important issues like, well, running Larry Summers off at Harvard, and, you know proving a woman can work a differential equation faster than a man with her bigger brain.
Monday, December 04, 2006
Issues of Legal Immigration and New Citizenship Test
From The Heritage Foundation, some key policy papers on legal immigration:
".....the key to America’s uniquely successful immigration story, lies in a deliberate and self-confident policy of patriotic assimilation—welcoming newcomers while insisting that they learn and embrace America’s civic culture and political institutions, thereby forming one nation from many peoples. While there are many differences of opinion when it comes to the overall number of immigrants and the process by which they come to this country, the one point on which there has always been widespread, bipartisan agreement is that those who come here should become Americans.
The overwhelming result of this assimilation policy, throughout the course of American history, has been a strengthening of our social capital, a continuing expansion of our general economy, and the constant renewal of our national purpose. America has been good for immigrants, and immigrants have been good for America. And so, as the issue is debated once again, it is imperative to revive the very policy that makes American immigration work, and get back to the hard and noble task of making citizens."
Read it all here.
Also, there are going to be some new questions on the US citizenship test soon. Read here. What, we're going to emphasize the our country's political tradition! What a novel, politically incorrect idea. And it's about time.
".....the key to America’s uniquely successful immigration story, lies in a deliberate and self-confident policy of patriotic assimilation—welcoming newcomers while insisting that they learn and embrace America’s civic culture and political institutions, thereby forming one nation from many peoples. While there are many differences of opinion when it comes to the overall number of immigrants and the process by which they come to this country, the one point on which there has always been widespread, bipartisan agreement is that those who come here should become Americans.
The overwhelming result of this assimilation policy, throughout the course of American history, has been a strengthening of our social capital, a continuing expansion of our general economy, and the constant renewal of our national purpose. America has been good for immigrants, and immigrants have been good for America. And so, as the issue is debated once again, it is imperative to revive the very policy that makes American immigration work, and get back to the hard and noble task of making citizens."
Read it all here.
Also, there are going to be some new questions on the US citizenship test soon. Read here. What, we're going to emphasize the our country's political tradition! What a novel, politically incorrect idea. And it's about time.
Sunday, December 03, 2006
John Piper on the Lawlessness of The Flesh
To my mind, one of the most compelling ministers today of the Gospel of Christ is John Piper of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis. A southern reverse carpet-bagger, his sermons are Biblical and clear for all those striving to grow on their spiritual journey.
Here he talks about our hatred of the law and need for self-rule.
St. Augustine's Best Known Quotes
"Da mihi castilat em et continentiam, sed noli modo."
("Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet.")
"Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum."
("Love the sinner and hate the sin.")
I am currently reading "The Confessions of St. Augustine" of Hippo and struck by the timelessness of his journey. Thoroughly debauched in his time, his conversion to Christ and subsequent transformation shows how God loves and forgives the worst of sinners and the greatest of naysayers.
And how He can ultimately use all our past experiences for the greater good.
("Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet.")
"Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum."
("Love the sinner and hate the sin.")
I am currently reading "The Confessions of St. Augustine" of Hippo and struck by the timelessness of his journey. Thoroughly debauched in his time, his conversion to Christ and subsequent transformation shows how God loves and forgives the worst of sinners and the greatest of naysayers.
And how He can ultimately use all our past experiences for the greater good.
Saturday, December 02, 2006
Womanly Role Models, Or Why We Need The Queen Now More Than Ever
The short version of this post on why we need more good and Godly feminine role models like The Queen, now more than ever, can be summed up as follows:
Britney Spears, Scarlett Johansson, Angelina Jolie, Princess Di, Paris Hilton, Madonna, suicide bomber and grandmother Fatma An-Najur, the 46 million women who had abortions last year as a way of "choosing" after rather than before the fact, and the almost 40% of mothers in this country who now have children out-of-wedlock, seemingly without need of a father, just to name a few.
The list goes on. The slope gets slipperier. The bar lower. The nonesense louder. The sense of entitlement grander. The clothes scantier. And the truth ever more relative.
If we don't like the way the world really operates, then we can bend reality to our basest desires and redefine it. Can't we?
The eyes and attention of the masses go so automatically to the most fascinating, stickiest, lowest common denominator that we fail to see the quieter, less obvious higher Truths of enduring life and love. Let alone have time to think about them.
And as we give our attention to their pruient machinations, even momentarily, we become accomplices to the ever-increasing depravity of our world.
And so without further ado, let us divert our attention elsewhere and leave Britney and her desperate-for-attention, clueless, childish companions to their own pathetic destruction, pray for their salvation and turn our gaze upwards.
The Queen might be a good place to start again.
Britney Spears, Scarlett Johansson, Angelina Jolie, Princess Di, Paris Hilton, Madonna, suicide bomber and grandmother Fatma An-Najur, the 46 million women who had abortions last year as a way of "choosing" after rather than before the fact, and the almost 40% of mothers in this country who now have children out-of-wedlock, seemingly without need of a father, just to name a few.
The list goes on. The slope gets slipperier. The bar lower. The nonesense louder. The sense of entitlement grander. The clothes scantier. And the truth ever more relative.
If we don't like the way the world really operates, then we can bend reality to our basest desires and redefine it. Can't we?
The eyes and attention of the masses go so automatically to the most fascinating, stickiest, lowest common denominator that we fail to see the quieter, less obvious higher Truths of enduring life and love. Let alone have time to think about them.
And as we give our attention to their pruient machinations, even momentarily, we become accomplices to the ever-increasing depravity of our world.
And so without further ado, let us divert our attention elsewhere and leave Britney and her desperate-for-attention, clueless, childish companions to their own pathetic destruction, pray for their salvation and turn our gaze upwards.
The Queen might be a good place to start again.
Friday, December 01, 2006
Alpha Female, Walk Softly but Carry a Big Stick
My sister's dog Sweet Pea. Ain't no limb too large, no fetch too far, no mountain too high and no dog too intimidating to keep her from gettin to her stick de la moment. And gettin and gettin and gettin and gettin.
Now, if we could get some of Sweet Pea's undaunted courage and steadfastness of purpose rechannelled into the MSM and other of our internal detractors, perhaps we could really make some headway in our War on Terror. Jihad? Sweet Pea is ready for anything if she can bring her stick to the party.
Notable, Quotable
"There's no such thing as a free lunch."
-----Milton Friedman
"The search for a scapegoat is the easiest of all hunting expeditions."
-----Dwight Eisenhower
-----Milton Friedman
"The search for a scapegoat is the easiest of all hunting expeditions."
-----Dwight Eisenhower
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)